Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Olds, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Olds, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 14, No. 3, 305-313, June 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

Psychological and perceived situational predictors of physical activity: a cross-sectional analysis

S. A. Mitchell and R. S. Olds1

School of Exercise, Leisure and Sport, and
1 Department of Health Education, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA

The purpose of this study was to identify psychological and self-reported situational factors that are associated with degree of involvement in moderate-intensity physical activity at various stages of adult life. The study is grounded in Personal Investment Theory which proposes that personal incentives, sense of self and perceived options determine behavior. Participants aged 18 and above, selected by random-digit dialling, were invited to participate in a study on physical activity habits. Of 251 who agreed to participate, 41.4% were male (N = 104) and 58.6% were female (N = 147). These participants were asked the number of days per week that they engaged in physical activity which accumulated a total of 30 min or more. The 140 participants who indicated one or more days of activity answered questions concerning personal incentives for physical activity, sense of self and perceived barriers. Stepwise multiple regression analyses and discriminant function analysis indicated that Personal Investment Theory is able to predict up to 29% of the variance associated with voluntary participation in moderate-intensity physical activity. Discussion focuses on implications for physical activity programs for citizens at different stages of their adult life.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
C. B. Anderson
When more is better: number of motives and reasons for quitting as correlates of physical activity in women
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2003; 18(5): 525 - 537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
L. M. Wen, M. Thomas, H. Jones, N. Orr, R. Moreton, L. King, P. Hawe, J. Bindon, J. Humphries, K. Schicht, et al.
Promoting physical activity in women: evaluation of a 2-year community-based intervention in Sydney, Australia
Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2002; 17(2): 127 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.